Sunday, March 11, 2012
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Let's Talk Pitching

In light of the imminent arrival of pitchers and catchers to Florida and Arizona I decided to write about pitching, and more specifically, starting pitching. As I alluded to in my previous post, every starter in a rotation has the ability to contribute as much as his fellow starters. The designation of #1 starter or #5 starter usually tells us something about a pitcher's value, but both the #1 and #5 starter in every rotation have equal opportunities to contribute.
This off-season a number of high quality starting pitchers changed teams including C.J Wilson (Rangers to Angels), Mark Buehrle (White Sox to Marlins), Edwin Jackson (Cardinals to Nationals), Gio Gonzalez (A's to Nats), and Matt Latos (Padres to Reds). Recently the trend in Major League Baseball has been to compile an elite set of starters in order to achieve success. Examples include the Phillies, Giants, Braves, and Rays. No matter how a general manager accomplishes this goal, putting together a great rotation instead of a star studded lineup has become the norm.
No division compiled more starting pitching in the last 3 years than the National League East. Whether by trade, free agency, or through the draft, the NL East is chock-full or great starters.
Philadelphia Phillies: When you think of great starting pitching there is almost no better place to start then the reigning NL East champion Phillies. With All-starts Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, and Cole Hamels topping the Phillies rotation, Philadelphia is poised to claim a 6th consecutive NL east title. With the emergence of Vance Worley as a reliable strike-throwing starter (61.5% F-strike%) the Phillies decided to allow the now older and more injury prone Roy Oswalt to test the free agent waters. This makes their rotation younger and less expensive, especially since both Cliff Lee and Cole Hamels will be making considerably more money in 2012 than in 2011. Rounding out the rotation is Joe Blanton. Blanton spent almost the entire 2011 season on the disabled list, but was integral to the Phillies' World Series runs in 2008 and 2009 and, like Worley, should provide the Phillies with 5 strike-throwing starting pitchers. Last season the Phillies 5 starting pitchers compiled a WAR of 28.8 utilizing Fangraphs' version of WAR. In comparison the 2011 Marlins starters compiled a measly 15.5 total WAR. The Phillies should be pleased with their rotation going into the 2012 season as it, along with the Giants rotation, is one of the top 2 rotations in the NL.
Atlanta Braves: To say the Braves have depth in their starting rotation is a massive understatement. 7 different starters could easily see themselves in the Braves 2012 rotation. Most teams would turn to the witchcraft to compile a group of arms like the Braves'. While the Braves' depth seems almost like overkill, it may prove vital to their success. Last season only veteran sinkerballer Tim Hudson reached the 200 inning plateau with no other Braves pitcher currently in the 2012 rotation throwing for more than 152.0 innings. Beginning the season 4/5 of the Braves rotation was born in the 1980's with two other possibilities (Randall Delgado and Julio Tehran) under the age of 23. The Braves rotation, unlike the Phillies, is made up of a lot of "ifs". For example, if Tommy Hanson continues his success as a big strikeout pitcher and stays healthy... and if Jair Jurrjens stays healthy and performs as stellar post-All-star break as he does before mid-season... and if Mike Minor and Brandon Beachy pitch at a more veteran level than their ages... and finally if Randall Delgado and Julio Tehran live up to their highly touted statuses... the Braves could have the best rotation in baseball. Is this likley? Probably not, but the Braves rotation has the potential to be incredible, which is better than most.
![]() |
If the Nats are to win Strasburg is the key |
![]() |
Anibal Sanchez |
Maybe Mr. Met should pitch |
Overall, the NL East could be one of if not the best pitching divisions in Major League Baseball, but nothing is certain until they play the games. Ranking these rotations isn't easy but I'm up for a challenge. #1 Phillies #2 Nationals #3 Braves #4 Marlins #5 Mets. The Marlins have the most potential to move up this list while the Braves and Nats have the most potential to move down. One fact is certain, the battle for NL East supremacy will be a fight to the finish.
Thursday, January 12, 2012
1st to 5th, They All Matter
Paul Maholm, Jake Westbrook, Chris Narveson, and Barry Zito. What do all of these seemingly random names have in common? They would all be considered the 5th starters for their respective teams heading into in the 2012 season. This begs another question: Why should we care about these back end of the rotation starters. These are players relegated to mediocrity, seldom spoken of, and often forgotten. Here lies the rub (no I'm not a Shakespeare major, but who wouldn't use the word rub). Each of these pitchers will start just as many games as their number one counterparts. In other words, Barry Zito, pending injury, will start in about 33 games, the same number as ace Tim Lincecum.
All general managers need 5 starting pitchers and although the better ones come first, each starter has the same potential to influence their team. Since 3 of the names mentioned above call the NL Central home let's focus on the middle division of the senior circuit. As a refresher, the teams, for now, include the World Series champion St. Louis Cardinals, the 2012 NL Central winning Milwaukee Brewers, the Chicago Cubs, Pittsburgh Pirates, and Houston Astros.
The above chart shows a few important statistics and other information concerning these players' 2011 seasons. In looking for patterns we can rule out experience because although all are veterans, some much more than others. Their ages all seem similar with Jake Westbrook the outlier at age 34. Other than age, these pitchers all display an interesting characteristic of 5th starters (at least in the NL central). That is that none of these players would be considered strikeout pitchers. In fact, 2 out of 5 are ground ball pitchers, namely Westrbook and Maholm. Eric Bedard's 8.7 K/9 shows a pitcher who still gets a good mix of swings-and-misses as well as called strikes. Interestingly, but not necessarily connected, Bedard also garnered the highest WAR last season.
So, it seems as though in this division the Cubs, who are rebuilding, and the Pirates, who look to improve upon 2011 but most likely won't win the division in 2012, have the best 5th starters. Either the Cardinals or Reds will win the 2012 NL Central, and neither of their 5th starters could muster more than 1.5 WAR last season. In addition, both Jake Westbrook and Mike Leake have FIP numbers over 4, which is above the league average. FIP, or fielding independent pitching, is a good indicator of future performance but not for evaluating a single season. One explanation for this disparity could be that both the Reds and Cardinals rely more heavily on their top-tier starters and care less about the back end of the rotation. Another explanation could be that these teams rely more on their offenses, thus they place less importance on pitching due to their offenses' ability to neutralize a mediocre pitcher. Both the Cardinals and Reds have dynamic offenses, something none of the other NL Central teams have, thus I would say this is the reason.
The Cubs recently signed Maholm to a 1-year contract worth about $4.25 million. This is not a considerably high price to pay for a ground ball pitcher who provides more than 2.0 WAR from the left side. Why then did a contending team not pick up the under-the-radar Maholm? Your guess is as good as mine, but since this is my blog my guess is all that matters. My guess is that the Reds are banking on he young Leake to improve this season, and Leake, still under his rookie contract, comes at a much lower price than Maholm. The Cardinals, who saved lots of money not signing Albert Pujols, probably should have considered Maholm. I understand that Jake Westbrook is under contract, but Maholm is the better pitcher. If it only costs them $4.25 million to sign Maholm for one year then as a theoretical Cardinals GM I would eat the cost of Westbrook's salary for this season, stick him in the bullpen, and sign Maholm. He will most likely make between 25 and 32 starts this season and with the division race looking slim, even a small advantage like this could push the scale towards St. Louis.
Finally, let's consider another idea. Who is the best 5th starter in Major League Baseball? I like using WAR because it is a statistic that denotes value. According to WAR statistics, Rangers RHP Alexei Ogando is the best 5th starter in MLB. His 3.6 WAR in 2011 is equivalent to Jaime Garcia, Gavin Floyd, and Derek Holland. Even Phillies rookie Vance Worley(2.5) captured a higher WAR than Maholm. The problem lies that both Ogando and Worley could be considered 4th or 5th starters on their respective teams, but in fairness because I have been using MLB.com's depth charts as references I must stay consistent.
Often times fifth starters are young pitchers getting their first chance in the big leagues, and others are fading old timers, once good, but now banished to the great hall of the pedestrian. In the end I think there should be a quest, especially amongst contending teams, to find the best fifth starter. All 5 guys in every rotation start almost the same number of games, and each game means just as much as the next. Thus, why not try to get the best man for each slot. Paul Maholm may have signed with the Cubs, and kudos to GM Jed Hoyer for stealing him from the many contenders who should have signed him. As usual, Hoyer and the rest of the Theo Epstein bunch remain ahead of the curve, but the main message is that each player on a team matters, so choose wisely and always attempt to make the right choice.
All general managers need 5 starting pitchers and although the better ones come first, each starter has the same potential to influence their team. Since 3 of the names mentioned above call the NL Central home let's focus on the middle division of the senior circuit. As a refresher, the teams, for now, include the World Series champion St. Louis Cardinals, the 2012 NL Central winning Milwaukee Brewers, the Chicago Cubs, Pittsburgh Pirates, and Houston Astros.
2012 Team | Player | Age | Season | WAR | FIP | K/9 | HR/FB | GB% |
Cubs | Maholm | 29 | 7th | 2.1 | 3.78 | 5.38 | 7.50% | 49.90% |
Cardinals | Westbrook | 34 | 11th | 1.1 | 4.25 | 5.11 | 11.40% | 59.30% |
Astros | Happ | 29 | 4th | 0.3 | 4.69 | 7.71 | 10.20% | 33.00% |
Brewers | Narveson | 30 | 4th | 1.5 | 4.06 | 7.01 | 9.60% | 42.30% |
Pirates | Bedard | 32 | 8th | 2.4 | 3.64 | 8.7 | 10.20% | 42.00% |
Reds | Mike Leake | 24 | 2nd | 1.5 | 4.22 | 6.33 | 13.90% | 47.70% |
The above chart shows a few important statistics and other information concerning these players' 2011 seasons. In looking for patterns we can rule out experience because although all are veterans, some much more than others. Their ages all seem similar with Jake Westbrook the outlier at age 34. Other than age, these pitchers all display an interesting characteristic of 5th starters (at least in the NL central). That is that none of these players would be considered strikeout pitchers. In fact, 2 out of 5 are ground ball pitchers, namely Westrbook and Maholm. Eric Bedard's 8.7 K/9 shows a pitcher who still gets a good mix of swings-and-misses as well as called strikes. Interestingly, but not necessarily connected, Bedard also garnered the highest WAR last season.
So, it seems as though in this division the Cubs, who are rebuilding, and the Pirates, who look to improve upon 2011 but most likely won't win the division in 2012, have the best 5th starters. Either the Cardinals or Reds will win the 2012 NL Central, and neither of their 5th starters could muster more than 1.5 WAR last season. In addition, both Jake Westbrook and Mike Leake have FIP numbers over 4, which is above the league average. FIP, or fielding independent pitching, is a good indicator of future performance but not for evaluating a single season. One explanation for this disparity could be that both the Reds and Cardinals rely more heavily on their top-tier starters and care less about the back end of the rotation. Another explanation could be that these teams rely more on their offenses, thus they place less importance on pitching due to their offenses' ability to neutralize a mediocre pitcher. Both the Cardinals and Reds have dynamic offenses, something none of the other NL Central teams have, thus I would say this is the reason.
The Cubs recently signed Maholm to a 1-year contract worth about $4.25 million. This is not a considerably high price to pay for a ground ball pitcher who provides more than 2.0 WAR from the left side. Why then did a contending team not pick up the under-the-radar Maholm? Your guess is as good as mine, but since this is my blog my guess is all that matters. My guess is that the Reds are banking on he young Leake to improve this season, and Leake, still under his rookie contract, comes at a much lower price than Maholm. The Cardinals, who saved lots of money not signing Albert Pujols, probably should have considered Maholm. I understand that Jake Westbrook is under contract, but Maholm is the better pitcher. If it only costs them $4.25 million to sign Maholm for one year then as a theoretical Cardinals GM I would eat the cost of Westbrook's salary for this season, stick him in the bullpen, and sign Maholm. He will most likely make between 25 and 32 starts this season and with the division race looking slim, even a small advantage like this could push the scale towards St. Louis.

Often times fifth starters are young pitchers getting their first chance in the big leagues, and others are fading old timers, once good, but now banished to the great hall of the pedestrian. In the end I think there should be a quest, especially amongst contending teams, to find the best fifth starter. All 5 guys in every rotation start almost the same number of games, and each game means just as much as the next. Thus, why not try to get the best man for each slot. Paul Maholm may have signed with the Cubs, and kudos to GM Jed Hoyer for stealing him from the many contenders who should have signed him. As usual, Hoyer and the rest of the Theo Epstein bunch remain ahead of the curve, but the main message is that each player on a team matters, so choose wisely and always attempt to make the right choice.
Monday, January 9, 2012
The Case For Kerry Wood
The Phillies have been rumored to be interested in RHP Kerry Wood. Here is my take on the situation originally posted to www.Phillysportsdaily.com
CaseforWood
CaseforWood
Sunday, January 1, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)