Friday, June 8, 2012

Wins and Losses

Losing isn't easy.  From heartbreak losses to nail biters to blowouts, one fact remains: losing is hard.  Ask anyone. The 12-year-old Little Leaguer, the multiple-time Super Bowl champion quarterback, and everyone in between will say the same thing.  Thirty-six-year-old Celtics center Kevin Garnett said it best after game 5 of the Eastern Conference Finals against the Heat.  Sideline reporter Doris Burke asked the former MVP, "What fuels you?" to which Garnett responded, "Competition."

When I first began playing truly competitive baseball I was 11 years old.  Up until this point my playing career consisted of having a daily catch with my father in the cul-de-sac outside of our house, and the bi-weekly games played in the local Jewish Community Center league.  Hubris and arrogance aside, most would say that for me, playing in the JCC league was unfair.  An early growth spurt allowed me to tower over most other players, most of whom did not care about winning or losing but wanted more than anything for their parents to take them out for ice cream after the game.  My perspective remained extremely different.  As the best pitcher in the league I loved racking up the strikeouts, forcing my Dad to record the number of pitches I threw and to analyze the stats in order to fix my mistakes during the cul-de-sac sessions.  Many say that competition is a natural instinct, a statement I agree with, but competition is like an unlit match, dormant until a quick strike causes the match to burn itself into extinction.

In JCC baseball my competitive attitude surfaced.  After only a few seasons, my parents and I realized that I needed better competition. After all, it is difficult to keep the competitive fire stoked when half of the batters I faced stood barely above 4 feet and wore long skirts that disguised the bottom of the strike zone.  I immediately moved from the JCC league to the Lower Merion Little League.  Here I was matched up against 10-12 year olds from all over the township, a much greater source of talent that hopefully would feed this recently cultivated competitive nature.  Finally, to play in a league in which my teammates and the coaches all took the games seriously and wanted to win, as opposed to merely "have fun" and yearn for the post game ice cream.  This experience began with "fall ball," which obviously occurs in the fall and not the spring.  Only the truly dedicated play baseball in the fall, right? This led me to believe that the other players would be committed to winning.  To my dismay, few of the  players and coaches interested in winning in the fall resided on my team. My coach viewed fall ball as a counterbalance to the competitive spring Little League season. Instead of playing the best players at their most effective positions, he played everyone where they wanted to play, so everyone pitched, in rotation.

I distinctly remember driving home with my Dad after one game, complaining to the point of anger about playing center field.  Another player on our team with little athletic talent but a strong desire to pitch gave up the lead and lost us the game.  For some reason I exclaimed, "no one else wants to win but me."  Now Dad has never been a sports playing type of person. Despite not being a great ballplayer, he has experienced loss and gave me some good advice.  He said, "Be patient, in the spring you will play for a different team, one where you'll feel more comfortable."  As an 11 year old I didn't truly understand patience, so I continued to complain, lamenting my team's lack of desire to compete and win.  Obviously, losing did not sit well with me.

Skip forward to next spring.  A whole winter of growth and practice behind me, I was ready for baseball to start again.  This time I intended to play for a team with a coach and teammates who shared my competitive desire to win.  Due to the high volume of players in the spring in comparison to the fall, the league holds tryouts to determine at what level everyone should play, the majors or the minors.  I felt confident in my abilities to make a team in the majors, but even still I hoped that the team on which I was placed would be a better fit for my competitive nature.  Luckily, I was drafted to a team coached by a father my parents and I both knew.  Let's call him coach "K," but not because his coaching skills measured up to the famous Coach K at Duke.  He and his son both wanted to win very badly; he had thus strategically constructed a team with experience, talent, and most importantly, a will to win. 

Our team performed well, winning most of our games, and making it to the playoffs.  I was named to the township All-star team along with three of my teammates.  In the first game of the playoffs, we faced a team that had won fewer games than us and against whom we felt very confident.  Most likely due to our over-confident demeanors, and probably a little bad luck, we lost the game, thus moving into the losers bracket.  This meant that another loss would end our hopes of capturing 1st place.  Following that first playoff game I remember feeling frustrated.  I blamed others, my teammates, my coach, and even the weather.  Losing isn't easy.  True competitors, the ones spoken of in stories, never blame their teammates; they look within themselves for answers and push themselves to be better.  This was a lesson I had not yet learned.  After 3 more games we found ourselves playing in the championship game against the second best team in the league.  I was charged with pitching and I promised myself that no matter what happened I would put forth everything I had.  I pitched well for 5 innings.  In the 6th and final inning, with the game tied the other team's best hitter came up.  Instead of using my best pitch, my fastball, I decided that with 2 strikes on the batter I would fool him by throwing a changeup, something I almost never did.  I hoped that the batter would swing through and strike out, thus giving us a good chance to win the game in the bottom of the inning.  Instead, he hit the first and only home run I ever surrendered in Little League.  We lost the game.  

A sign from the Phillies 10,000th loss

Losing isn't easy, no matter level competition.  When a franchise has compiled 10,000 losses at the professional level, losing becomes the default culture of the fans and the organization.  Just ask the Phillies, still the only professional sports team to compile at least 10,000 losses.  I attended the Phillies 10,000th loss, a Sunday night against the St. Louis Cardinals.  That loss felt similar to the hundreds of other losses I had witnessed as a fan.  Each loss stung, but every successive loss brought less frustration and more acceptance.  Fortunately, the Phillies forsook their losing ways, made the playoffs in 2007, and then won the World Series in 2008.  Since 2007, the Phillies have not missed the post-season, a testament to the change not only in the product on the field, but in the attitudes of the players, coaches, front office staff, and even the fans.  For as much as losing is difficult, winning is easy.   Why do Yankees fans bemoan every Yankee loss, thus making a name for themselves as the crankiest and some would say most annoying fans in baseball? Perhaps, to a large extent, because they are used to winning.




Jimmy Rollins and the Phillies are last in the NL East

Losing isn't easy, no matter level competition.  When a franchise has compiled 10,000 losses at the professional level, losing becomes the default culture of the fans and the organization.  Just ask the Phillies, still the only professional sports team to compile at least 10,000 losses.  I attended the Phillies 10,000th loss, a Sunday night against the St. Louis Cardinals.  That loss felt similar to the hundreds of other losses I had witnessed as a fan.  Each loss stung, but every successive loss brought less frustration and more acceptance.  Fortunately, the Phillies forsook their losing ways, made the playoffs in 2007, and then won the World Series in 2008.  Since 2007, the Phillies have not missed the post-season, a testament to the change not only in the product on the field, but in the attitudes of the players, coaches, front office staff, and even the fans.  For as much as losing is difficult, winning is easy.   Why do Yankees fans bemoan every Yankee loss, thus making a name for themselves as the crankiest and some would say most annoying fans in baseball? Perhaps, to a large extent, because they are used to winning.


Recently, Phillies fans have had to deal with the difficulty of losing (28-31 record to this point).  The other day, I read an on-line article on the Philadelphia Daily News sport page.  It concerned the no-trade clauses in Chase Utley and Cliff Lee's contracts.  In the comments section, an obviously frustrated fan claimed that General Manager Ruben Amaro is awful and that his "
raj" needed to end in order for the Phillies to regain their winning ways.  Can this fan write off all of the Phillies recent success, calling for a man to be fired due to one bad third of a season?  I too disagree with many of the Phillies recent moves, but instead of complaining about the past, I hope the Phillies rebuild their underwhelming farm system by trading big names like Cole Hamels, Hunter Pence, and Shane Victorino. 

As my father taught me back in Little League, "patience is key."  Sometimes you have to experience the frustration of losing to properly value the joy of victory.  Winning is difficult to sustain, and often times teams need to prepare to win in the future by accepting failure in the short term.  Little League taught me that losing is grueling, exhausting, and above all else, disappointing.  Competition and the will to win fuels all of us, from Kevin Garnett, to the young Little Leaguer, to every Phillies fan out there.  So with all this in mind, let's take a lesson from our Little League selves: while losing may be difficult, we must respond with patience and discipline.  Instead of bitching and moaning about the Phillies recent losses, including a current 6-game losing streak, let us think critically about the team's issues and how best to resolve them in order to bring back the winning spirit that has fueled Citizens Bank Park and the entire city for the last 5 seasons.  Complaining gets us nowhere; just as Kevin Garnett uses his desire to compete to get himself ready to play every game, Phillies fans should channel their competitive spirit in constructive ways, instead of complaining like petulant children.

Monday, June 4, 2012

No Hits, No Runs, No Problem

Santana Celebrates with Catcher Josh Thole

On Friday night the Mets played the Cardinals in the beginning of a four game series.  This seemingly innocuous inter-divisional series turned into an historic one very quickly.  Johan Santana made sure that Mets fans, and baseball fans everywhere, would remember June 1st, 2012.  Santana threw the first no-hitter in New York Mets history.  For some perspective, think about this: The Mets franchise began in 1962, replacing those of the Brooklyn Dodgers and New York Giants, who departed New York for Los Angeles and San Francisco respectively.  Half a century later, the 2012 Mets are an interesting team.   The Mets have stormed the 2012 season, thought to be a rebuilding year, with ferocity.  Now midway through the season, they find themselves tied atop the tightly packed NL East, a place which no analyst, pundit, or fan thought they would occupy.  They have won 31 games, doing so with mostly home grown players whom few thought would contribute sun flower seed shells to the dugout floor let alone 239 runs to the scoreboard (4th in the NL).  At one point this season, the Mets, starting lineup contained players all from their farm system, and daring feat.

Despite the 2012 Mets doing their best job to imitate the “Amazin's” of the past, nothing can overshadow Johan Santana's recent no-hitter.  Santana faced the Cardinals, the National League's best offense, making them look like a Little league team playing at PETCO Park.  Despite the no-hitte result, Santana wasn't at his best Friday night,  his control shaky at times, especially when throwing his fastball.  He walked 5, struck out 8, and threw a career high 134 pitches in the momentous effort.  Nonetheless, he was effectively wild to the point that hitters could not pick up his dynamic changeup, which he used early, often, and on any count.  Santana did a fantastic job keeping the St. Louis hitters <consider “sluggers” instead for alliterative effect> off balance, forcing them to swing at pitches out of the zone and keeping them guessing whether they would next encounter his incredibly deceptive changeup.

Santana's no-hitter did not occur without some controversy.  Former Met Carlos Beltran hit a line drive down the third base line that on instant replay clearly hit the line, making it a fair ball and thus a hit (video footage of the play can be seen here).  Not so fast, said third base umpire Adrian Johnson,who called the screamer a foul ball, thus continuing Beltran's at bat and keeping the no-hitter intact.  The Saturday morning St. Louis Post-Dispatch sports section prominently placed an asterisk next to "no-hitter", making an obvious reference to the hit that wasn't. <St. Louis is a town well accustomed to asterisks, eh?> While Cardinals fans may not be happy with the result Friday night, is this missed call such a big deal?  Certainly, Adrian Johnson made the wrong call, and it may anger some to see that call stand. However, until MLB incorporates instant replay into game decisions, fans must expect the human element to come into play.    In no way did Adrian Johnson's blunder fall in the same category as the missed call that cost Armando Galarraga a perfect game, but it does rekindle the on going argument in baseball concerning the a role for instant replay.   

Mets General Manager Sandy Alderson



In the end, the call on the field was foul ball, giving Johan Santana the first no-hitter of his career and in Mets history.  This leaves the San Diego Padres as the lone franchise in MLB history with no pitcher having thrown a no-hitter.  For comparison's sake, the Dodgers franchise has had 20 no-hitters, the most in MLB history.  As someone pointed out to me, the Padres also have never had a hitter hit for the cycle, but the latter event seems more of an aesthetic accomplishment than does a no-hitter.  Now that the Mets have the no-hitter monkey off from their backs, perhaps fans will take notice of their team's overall success.  The 2012 Mets have a bright future with minds like Sandy Alderson, Paul DePodesta, and J.P. Riccardi in the front office and a solid manager, Terry Collins, at the helm.  Watch out for the Mets: they exude a great attitude on the field, and in a tight and competitive NL East, anything can happen between midseason and the playoffs.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Ailing Arms

Roy "Doc" Halladay
Yesterday the Phillies received news that ace right-handed pitcher Roy Halladay will occupy the disabled list for 6-8 weeks.  Phillies pitching coach Rich Dubee removed Halladay from his most recent start after only 2 innings claiming, "I know he's had a cranky shoulder and he hasn't looked right, and didn't look right today."  Prior to Sunday, Halladay had looked a bit off.  His fastball velocity has been lower than usual, down from 94mph to 91mph, and his other numbers have seemed subpar for a pitcher consistently in the running for the Cy Young award.  The news of his shoulder strain should come as little surprise to fans who have diligently followed Doc's season.  No matter how predictable, Halladay's trip to the disabled list comes at a time in which the Phillies find themselves in last place in the NL east.  The team continues have numerous offensive woes, partially due to the absences of Chase Utley and Ryan Howard, and partially due to the lack of solid offensive threats throughout their current lineup.  


The 2012 Phillies have the second highest payroll in Major League Baseball at $173,953,939.  In 2008, the year the team won the World Series, the Phillies payroll was $98,269,880.  In 4 seasons the team has added $75,684,059 in payroll and 0 world series titles.  Admittedly, the team has made the playoffs each of the last 4 seasons, but with no more rings to show for the added expenditures.  In addition to adding significantly to the payroll, the Phillies have traded away many of their top prospects in order to acquire veteran players.  Phillies General Manager Ruben Amaro traded Travis D'arnaud and Kyle Drabek for Roy Halladay, Anthony Gose and Jonathan Villar for Roy Oswalt, and Jared Cosart and Jonathan Singleton for Hunter Pence.  All three trades contributed to the depletion of the farm system, to the point at which Baseball Prospectus writer Kevin Goldstein describes it as "An unbalanced, shallow system bolstered by some big arms, both in terms of size and velocity." So, in conclusion, the Phillies mortgaged the future in order to win now.  Thus, if the team concludes that the team will not make the playoffs this season, the only logical decision is to trade away certain older parts in order to regain a lower payroll and better farm system.  

The question is, if the team decides to turn the 2012 season into a fire sale, who do they trade and who do they keep?  Veterans Jimmy Rollins, Placido Polanco, Chase Utley, Ryan Howard, and Jonathan Papelbon are most likely untradable with their current contracts, ages, health, and production, while catcher Carlos Ruiz would not garner a great return despite putting up All-star numbers this season.  Tradeable players include Shane Victorino, Cliff Lee, Roy Halladay, Hunter Pence, and Cole Hamels.  Of these select few, the Phillies might have most trouble getting good value in return for Halladay and Lee because of Halladay's age and recent arm troubles and Lee's large contract.  Even without the possibility of trading Halladay and Lee, a number of other players might give the Phillies a chance to replenish an ugly looking farm system.  

Hunter Pence, for whom the Phillies traded in 2011, has underperformed this season, but still remains extremely valuable.  He provides above average fielding in right field with solid hitting.  Pence has compiled at least a 3.2 WAR every season he has played, while making 3 All-star teams.  At 29 years old Pence has one more year of arbitration and then becomes a free agent in 2014.  He is a perfect candidate for a trade except that the Phillies may not receive as much for him as they gave away to Houston.


Shane Victorino is a versatile outfielder who plays hard, can hit in multiple spots in the order, provides speed and some power, while playing outstanding defense.  Victorino's lone blemishes include his contract, which expires at the end of this season, and his age, 31.  A team needing to add some speed and experience to their outfield would love to add a player like Victorino.  Like Pence, Victorino may not garner a great bounty, but I would not be surprised to see a team trade 2 B level prospects or 1 A level prospect for the veteran (the Twins did trade Wilson Ramos for Matt Capps....Matt Capps).


Will Hamels wear Phillies red in 2013?
The golden goose is Cole Hamels.  Hamels is young, 28, and extremely talented,  8-1 with a 2.43 ERA, 2.93 FIP, 1.01 WHIP, and 9.29 K/9.  Above all else, he has post-season experience (see 2008 NLCS and World Series MVP awards) and he has been improving his pitching acumen by adding the cutter and curveball to his repertoire.  Hamels lone problem is his contract situation.  Hamels current deal expires at the end of this season and he will most likely command a huge amount of money this off-season.  This situation might scare off some potential suitors who are unwilling to trade the type of prospects needed to land Hamels in order to have him pitch for only half a season.  Nonetheless, the Phillies could demand and receive a team's best hitting and pitching prospects for Hamels.


Ruben Amaro Jr. next to Phillies Manager Charlie Manuel
While I do not foresee the Phillies trading Victorino, Pence, or Hamels, the best decision may be to abandon ship and sell the cargo for as much gold as possible.  Ruben Amaro has never been the General Manager during hard times, as he took over for Pat Gillick after the 2008 season.  Although he may not want to admit defeat, especially after putting so much effort into compiling the 2012 squad, becoming sellers as the trade deadline nears may become the most optimum choice for the future of the Phillies ball club.  Most analysts agree that Amaro has built the Phillies to win now, and not to win in the future.  There is a reason why winners of the lottery decide to be paid their winnings over a long period of time as opposed to all at once, people like consistency.  It was Joseph who foretold Pharaoh of 7 plentiful years followed by 7 lean year, but is was also Joseph who advised the Egyptian king to store food from the first 7 years in order to feed the country during the next 7.  This story illustrates the need for consistency.  Fans want to watch a winning team, and unless the Phillies make some moves, their future may be riddled with losses.  This is the time in which we find out if Ruben Amaro has true greatness as a General Manager because leaders need to know when to go all-in just as much as they must understand when to walk away and cash out.



Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Hello Again


 I haven't updated Summer Pastime in a little while, but I plan to get back into it soon.  In the meantime, I leave you with this article,Jose Altuve, written by Jerry Crasnick of ESPN.  I like his stuff, and this article is a perfect example.